MoEFCC DRAFT EIA NOTIFICATION,2020: Public on Back Seat ?
0407202
Rajesh Deoliya
The draft EIA Notification,2020 describes “Public Consultation" as the process by which the concerns of local affected persons and others, who have plausible stake in the environmental impact of the project, are ascertained with a view to appropriately take into account all such material concerns while designing the project. The concept of public hearing was introduced for the first time on 27.01.1994 through S.O 60(E) 27.01.1994 of Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. Government of India. In receiving environmental clearance public hearing is most difficult process. It is first point where project proponent directly interact with the local public.
2.0 LEGAL REQUIREMENT OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE:
The EIA Notification, 2006
para 7(iii) mandates public hearing which is further detailed in Appendix IV of
the same notification. It is stated as
All Category ‘A’ and Category B1 projects or activities shall undertake Public Consultation,
except the following:-
i
|
Modernization of irrigation projects (item 1(c) (ii) of the Schedule
to the notification) |
Ii
|
All projects or activities located within industrial estates or parks (item 7(c) of the Schedule to the notification) approved by the concerned authorities, and which are not disallowed in such approvals. |
Iii
|
Expansion of Roads and Highways
(item 7 (f) to the notification) which
do not involve any further acquisition of land. |
Iv
|
Maintenance dredging provided the
dredged material shall be disposed within port limits |
v
|
All Building or Construction
projects or Area Development projects (which do not contain any category ‘A’
projects and activities) and Townships (item 8(a) and 8(b) in the Schedule to
the notification).” |
vi
|
All Category ‘B2’ projects and
activities. |
Vii
|
All projects or activities
concerning national defence and security or involving other strategic considerations
as determined by the Central Government. |
Public Hearing is conducted by the Pollution Control Board (PCB) of state or Union Territory concerned within 45 days of a request from the applicant. The concerned public is informed through advertisement in newspaper and also through the public announcement in concerned areas. It is presided over by District Magistrate or his representative, Officers of Pollution Control Board.
(a) Disclosure of Project Information to Public:
The project proponent makes available copies of
executive summary and draft EIA- EMP report of the project for the knowledge of
general public at designated places like gram panchayat ,PCB office, District
Collector office, at web site of the PCB concerned etc
(b) Location of Public
hearing :
The public hearing should be carried out at the
proposed project site or in its close proximity- district wise, to be carried
out in the manner prescribed in Appendix IV of the notification so that the
project affected persons can participate.
(c) Disclosure of Project
related information during Public Hearing
The project proponent through the presentation
describes the project details, its effect on environment, mitigation measures
to control pollutants, project benefits
to stake holders, expenditures towards corporate social responsibilities, the
permissions and clearances obtained etc.
(d) Videography:
The entire process of public hearing from start to finish is videographed for future reference. The videography should be uninterrupted, neat and clear view of proceedings.
(e) Recording of views:
After completion of presentation the presentees can
express their concerns about the project. It may be in faour or against or
neutral. The written submissions at venue, by post to regulating authorities
can also be made, if desired. Later, the reply to the queries are made by
project proponent. They become part of
minutes of meeting of public hearing and become integral part of the final
environmental impact assessment and environmental management plan which is the
basic document for assessment by Expert Appraisal Committee for grant of
environmental clearance.
4.0
GENERAL CONCERNS IN PUBLIC HEARING:
There
may be many concerns in the mind of local public about certain project, these
concerns are project specific but some of them which are most common are listed below:
Education and Employment |
Land Price and Compensation |
Pollution |
Water
Problems |
Corporate Social Responsibilities. |
Deforestation |
Adivasi Land Acquisition |
Health and Sanitation |
Transportation |
Ash disposal from Power Plants |
Large area required for major projects like
Thermal Power Plant |
Heavy Number of land loser (River Valley
Projects) |
Shortage of water in down stream side (in
River Valley Projects) |
Flooding due to River Valley Projects |
Loss of agriculture land (Loss of
agriculture land) |
Submergence of archeological sites |
Large scale resettlements and
Rehabilitation(in River Valley Projects ) |
Demographic change and Cultural Shift |
Socio –economic issues. |
Disturbance to Terrestrial Flora and fauna |
Socio Economic Environment |
Women
Empowerment |
Loss of
aquatic ecology |
River
valley projects are generally inhabited by Adivasi community which is main
sufferer due to loss of land and lower skill for negotiation for land price
and better livelihood. |
5.0 The
DRAFT EIA NOTIFICATION,2020: Avoiding Public Hearing
The draft
notification,2020 have received very high critical response due to proposed drifting
from present EIA Notification,2006 in many ways. The Public Hearing is one of
them. According to the sub clause 10 of the draft Notification, 2020; the
projects falling in category 'A' and 'B 1' will be requiring public consultation
while projects falling in category 'B2' will not require public consultation
Further, the clause
14 ( c) states that if required, based on the nature of project, public
consultation through any other appropriate mode may be recommended by the
Appraisal Committee, or the Regulatory Authority, on case to case basis;
However, the Regulatory Authority may decide on the feasibility and requirement
of public hearing and/or consultation in the case of defence projects being
considered under sub-clause (7) of clause 5 of this notification. Its worry some that this clause may be
applied to the category A and B1 projects which will defeat the purpose of
public hearing, conceptualized way back in 1994. Recently, taking advantage of COVID-19
pandemic situation one such public hearing is conducted in Maharashtra through
Video Conference mode in Nagpur district for sand mining projects.
Sl |
The Disputed Clauses for Public Hearing in
Draft EIA,2020 |
Comments |
1 |
All
Category ‘A’ and Category “B1” projects of new or expansion proposals or
modernization with capacity increase more than 50 percent shall undertake
Public Consultation. Provided, the public consultation is exempted for the
following:- a. modernization of irrigation projects falling
under the item 4 of the Schedule; b. all projects falling under items 10(f), 16,
17, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 27, 36, 40 of the schedule located
within Notified Industrial
Estates; c. all projects falling under item 42 and 43 of
the Schedule; d. all Category ‘B2’ projects and activities; e. all projects concerning national defence and
security or involving other strategic considerations as
determined by the Central Government; f. all
linear projects under item 31 and 38, in Border Areas. g. all the
off-shore projects located beyond the 12 Nautical Miles Provided
further, that in all the projects under item 31( i.e pipeline projects Oil,
coal slurry etc) of the schedule, the
public consultation shall be limited to the district (s), where the National
Park or Sanctuary or Coral Reef or Ecological Sensitive Area is located. |
The clause of giving exemption for capacity
increase of more than 50 percent is against the principle of consultation
with local public. Because say for example a 5 million tonne mine can expand
its production further 2.5million tone to achieve total 7.5 million tonne
production capacity, while for a fresh 2.5 million tonne project public
hearing is required. This can be applied to many other projects also. The
point of argument is that the quantity of pollutants are increasing and
surpass the threshold standards and in many cases, the existing projects are
not following pollution norms. The recent LG Polymer case is good example of
this, where a gas leakage has taken many lives. Incidentally the project was
situated in notified industrial area. |
2 |
In case
the SPCB or UTPCC concerned does not undertake and complete the public
hearing within the specified period, as above, the Regulatory Authority shall
engage another public agency or authority which is not subordinate to the
Regulatory Authority, to complete the process within a further period of
forty working days, as per procedure laid down in this Notification |
This situation is expected in election days
which results in delay of the public hearing due engagement of local
administration in election work. This is a good move which assures time bound
public hearing. |
3 |
If the
public agency or authority nominated under the sub-clause (7) of the
notification,2020 reports to the Regulatory Authority concerned that owing to
the local situation, it is not possible to conduct the public hearing in a
manner which will enable the views of the concerned local persons to be
freely expressed, it shall report the facts in detail to the concerned
Regulatory Authority, which may, after due consideration of the report and
other reliable information that it may have, decide that the public consultation
in the case need not include the public hearing. |
This is one of the highly debated change in
the draft notification which dilutes the importance of public hearing, in
extraordinary situation this may be accepted but fear is that this should not
become a practice because in coal mining, iron Ore, Bauxite, Thermal Power
Plants, River Valley projects, highway projects etc we have seen the local
resistant for the projects. By this clause the projects can get the
environmental clearance but practically it may be difficult for project
proponents to work smoothly in the area in friendly way. This clause gives
route for bypassing public hearing process and only some writing comments will be enough to
fulfill the conditions of public consultation of which public hearing is a
part. |
6.0 The
Conclusion:
The public
consultations must not be bypassed or made to be flexible to such extent that
it can be mis-utilized. A transparent and fair public hearing has got more
importance when thrust is made to boost the plummeted economy. A project works, for several years in an area, hence its activities lay a vital role in day to
day life of the local community. Hence listening and addressing the demands of
public will certainly give confidence to allow industries in those areas also
which are still untouched by developmental process.
***
Comments
Best wishes,
Subhash